All four of these chapters provided very useful insight to
the grading process and policy that I may not have considered had I not read
them. For example, I always thought that
a zero was a zero and that it had the same effect in the gradebook as any other
failing grade, because an F is an F.
Maybe I thought this because I’m simply not a math person and my brain
just doesn’t think in terms of averages and numbers and all that, or because I
had so many teachers that said an incomplete assignment equaled a zero. I thought that giving a zero for a missing
assignment made sense because zero stands for nothing: there was no assignment
handed in. BUT, after reading Chapter 11
I can totally see how giving a zero for an incomplete assignment could really
mess up a kid’s final grade and skew his level of mastery. In my classroom, I won’t give out zeros for
this reason—grades should always indicate mastery, otherwise the evaluation we give
our students is inaccurate. I do,
however, feel that including comments on report cards is extremely necessary,
because it is important to take things like effort, timeliness, and completion
rate into consideration. If a student
knows that homework isn’t graded in any way shape or form, they are less likely
to take it seriously. For this reason, I
will include a separate grading criteria beyond mastery when I am assessing my
students. I will also try to use a
smaller grading scale whenever possible, as suggested in Chapter 12, because it
is more useful and can provide better feedback.
In terms of the different types of gradebook formats presented in
Chapter 13, I personally liked the format that grades according to
standards. Not only are standards
becoming more prominent in schools, I think that this format allows more specificity
to student mastery and are therefore more useful, insightful, and less
subjective than categorizing mastery based on assessment type. Of course, I understand that this format will
not work all the time, and it is important to be flexible and tailor gradebook
formats to student needs and course objectives. (I also really liked the
topics-based gradebook approach because it connects topic to assignments and is
quite specific.) In terms of report card
formats, I simply couldn’t decide which I liked best; I think it will depend on
my students and the school I am teaching in.
Wednesday, March 16, 2016
Monday, March 14, 2016
FAIE Chapters 7-10
Each of these chapters focused on grades and grading
policy. While some of the material (especially
that found in Chapter 9) seemed like common sense, some of the material struck
me as surprising at first, but then made more sense as I continued to read
on. For example, I always thought that
students should be and are graded on things like participation and effort, but
I never considered how such factors could skew a student’s grade in terms of
mastery. Because I feel that students
deserve to be “rewarded” for their hard work, I thought that it would make
sense to include these factors in the grading criteria, but these chapters of
the book emphasize that the purpose of grades is to measure mastery and nothing
else. This does make sense, however,
especially since education has become standards-based. Also, because grades are subjective and
oftentimes controversial, it is important for students to understand why they
are receiving the grades they get; never let a grade speak for itself. As a teacher, I will make sure to include
commentary and rationales along with grades so that students and parents can
make sense of them. I also believe in
recognizing student effort and participation without including it in the
gradebook. Instead, I will use feedback
and reinforcement both through formative assessment, and later, in a “separate
column on the report card” (112). Like
the book states, students are more likely to work harder when they know their
effort is appreciated, but they also may need extra feedback and motivation
when it comes to putting forth a little more effort. I will never have this extra motivation stem
from giving a student a bad grade, however; instead, I will give them feedback
before it is time for me to determine their level of mastery. And, if a student is still struggling when
the time of assessment comes, I will give them the opportunity to redo the work
whenever it is feasible. I found Chapter
10 to have strong insights towards redoing work. For example, I never really considered that allowing
students to redo tests whenever they want could result in them becoming “chronic
redoers.” This had made me realize that
I will need to establish a policy regarding redos before the school year begins
so that I can be prepared for all kinds of circumstances.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)